Willkommen auf unserem Seminar-Blog

Immer auf dem aktuellen Stand bleiben

Dieser Seminar-Blog befindet sich noch im Aufbau und wird in den kommenden Tagen entsprechend verfeinert.

Member Login

Lost your password?

Registration is closed

Sorry, you are not allowed to register by yourself on this site!

You must either be invited by one of our team member or request an invitation by email at viad.info {at} zhdk {dot} ch.

Comparison – Real vs. Virtual (Digital)

4. October 2010

Beyond Geolimitation

From the insights gathered I started a comparison between real viewpoints and the possibilities of Virtual or digital technologies. The first aspect i looked at was location. Here there are 2 advantages of the virtual imaging compared to real life. Firstly in many viewpoints there are unwanted obstructions to the view. In digital imaging these can be removed or certain parts of the image enhanced. Secondly, we are limited to reachable spots for observation and are usually limited by our body height. In digital imaging, the images can be taken at extreme positions, for example using a high pole, extreme low positions (frog eye view) or even underwater.

Transcending Time

Using the starting point of navigation between spots being about distance and time, I also started looking at time as a potential factor. As 360 degree images are usually still photos there are some limitations, but also interesting possibilities. A viewing point can be viewed at certain times of the day, but usually not over extended periods over the whole day, the year or even longer periods. Using digital technolgies (time-lapse) the user could scrub through time and view a certain spot at different times.

Extending Senses

Thirdly the images as well as other immersive aspects can be enhanced. Examples for this would be the use of night-vision, IR photography or long exposure. Sound is an important factor for our comprehension of a space and should be part of the immersive experience. The sound can also be enhanced using digital technologies.